The actual structure of autonomous driving robot OS and DAO-based governance for shared ownership of machine assets @openmind_agi , @xmaquina , @BitRobotNetwork As autonomous robots become connected to networks and managed as digital assets, the questions of who owns the robots, who operates them, and on what basis they are controlled are being organized into a clearer structure. Recent research and actual projects treat autonomous robots not as a single integrated system but as cyber-physical systems where ownership, intelligence, and operation are separated. A case that most clearly illustrates this trend is the structure composed of OpenMind, XMAQUINA, and BitRobot. This structure defines autonomous robots as on-chain assets, allowing distributed participants to jointly own them while demonstrating a realistic approach to maintaining safe operation in real physical environments. XMAQUINA is responsible for the ownership layer that represents robots and machine assets as assets on the blockchain. In this system, robots are treated not merely as equipment but as assets managed through legal wrappers and blockchain registration, with governance rights over the entire asset pool granted through the DEUS token. At the same time, SubDAOs are formed for individual robots or specific units of machine assets, allowing for independent financial management and decision-making for each asset. While this structure successfully expresses digital ownership, it does not include features for automatically tracking depreciation or maintenance costs, and revenue distribution occurs not in real-time but through governance procedures. OpenMind is responsible for the intelligence layer where robots actually move and make judgments, centered around the robot operating system called OM1. OM1 is designed to be independent of specific hardware, managing the entire process from perception to memory, planning, and action at a single operating system level. This system can quickly add new task capabilities through a natural language-based interface, and the judgments made by the robots are designed to occur locally. This is because situations occurring in the physical environment require responses in milliseconds. OpenMind's FABRIC protocol provides identity verification, collaboration rules, and audit systems among multiple robots, helping them operate as trustworthy entities within the network. Additionally, through x402 payment integration, robots can perform USDC-based inter-machine payments when utilizing services like charging or data processing, but since robots cannot directly handle gas costs, a pre-signed payment approval method is used. BitRobot is the operational layer responsible for what tasks the robots actually perform and how the results are verified. This system is based on a subnet structure where subnet owners define missions and rules, subnet contributors provide robots or computing resources, and subnet validators verify the results of tasks. The key concept here is verifiable robot work, where the value of the tasks performed by robots is proven on-chain based on whether quality and fairness criteria are met. Each robot has a unique on-chain identity through equipment node tokens, and work history and performance metrics payment records are connected and managed. An important point in this combined structure is that digital ownership and physical control are clearly separated. The DAO structure of XMAQUINA is responsible for decision-making regarding capital allocation and revenue distribution but does not intervene in real-time judgments such as path planning or obstacle avoidance for the robots. Such judgments are processed based on predefined safety constraints and local autonomy at the operating system level of OpenMind. The verification system of BitRobot also only verifies the results of tasks post-factum and does not direct the immediate actions of the robots. This clearly reveals the temporal difference where governance decisions can be made over days, while robot actions occur in milliseconds. The responsibilities and safety issues that arise when robots operating in the physical world have a distributed ownership structure can also be summarized as confirmed facts to date. There are no clear automated criteria for determining to whom responsibility should be attributed among the operating system developers, DAO voting participants, or hardware maintenance personnel when a robot causes an accident. In practice, both OpenMind's charging infrastructure and BitRobot's data collection cases maintain human remote intervention and centralized safety management systems. This shows that it is not a fully unmanned operation but a structure that necessarily includes human intervention for safety. Such a structure well illustrates how autonomous driving robots and DAO-based governance are already being used in reality. DAOs are utilized as a means to transparently manage the ownership and capital flow of machine assets, including robots, while the robot operating system embeds technical constraints that prioritize physical safety, regardless of these governance decisions. The operational and verification layers are responsible for recording and evaluating the tasks performed by robots but do not engage in real-time control. The current model of autonomous driving robots and DAO-based shared ownership can be summarized as a structure where distributed ownership and centralized technical responsibility coexist, which is an objective operational method confirmed in actual deployment cases. $DEUS $x402 $USDC $MIND