Trendaavat aiheet
#
Bonk Eco continues to show strength amid $USELESS rally
#
Pump.fun to raise $1B token sale, traders speculating on airdrop
#
Boop.Fun leading the way with a new launchpad on Solana.
Tintin(3/3) 💢
Validate your answer with a position
Tintin(3/3) 💢 kirjasi uudelleen
Isn't Aspecta essentially an asset issuance platform, although the story and concept are very sexy, but the problem is that the volume is small, and the cumulative transaction volume is only 50M.
A low ceiling, but with innovative projects, was blown to a height that did not belong to him.
Even Merl has a great Confucian debate, and it is time to connect Guangzi and stick it to the family. 😭😭😭
16,72K
Yajiang Group has a total investment of 1.2 trillion yuan, or 165 billion US dollars, and cold knowledge is almost 1.5 Solana.
If Yajiang Group issues a currency-based token YJB, which is directly anchored to the hydropower assets and its power generation capacity behind it, factories, computing power centers, etc. can use YJB to purchase future electricity consumption rights, lock in electricity costs in advance, and resist the risk of electricity price fluctuations. YJB can also participate in staking to earn income, and YJB can also provide liquidity to earn fees in the liquidity pool as a collateral asset.
Dishes, what a dish!
377,13K
To be honest, I wasn't very determined to buy $MORE at that time, UniCall fell like that on the day it was launched, I wanted to cut it for a while, but in the end I didn't move, maybe I was lazy, or maybe I believed in fish balls.
Later, I found out that the floating profit in my UnicornX wallet was already 60%+, and today I saw Ann's general @A_unicornverse's push, and I realized that someone really remembered our choice of not running.
I got a diamond hand airdrop, not much, but for the first time I was recognized on-chain for trust rather than speculation. Now that the market value of $MORE has risen to 16M, many talents have begun to study this project. I will continue to hold this batch of tokens, points or anything is not the point, I want to see how far this thing can go.
There's something about Moonveil's expression and aesthetic, and I've read MJ @Moonveil_Meej's tweet a few times, and it doesn't look like it's packaged.
In this market now, trust is the rarest alpha.
5,16K
$KET has successfully landed on Kraken, and the team behind it has made obvious moves. As the core leader of the AVAX ecosystem, the circulating chips are limited and the proportion of official positions is high.
I am still quite optimistic about its potential and hope that it can drive the entire ecosystem to become active.
9,32K
Gmira(3/3)
Tried out Mira’s Verify system — pretty interesting.
It breaks down AI-generated content sentence by sentence, and runs each through multiple validators.
•If they agree, it’s marked green (true) or red (false).
•If they disagree, it’s gray — no consensus.
What stood out to me: the gray ones are actually the most common, but rarely talked about.
Most AI outputs aren’t clearly right or wrong — they just sit in that uncertain middle ground.
Verify feels more like infra than just a tool. Two things I liked:
1. It mirrors the real world — not everything has a yes/no answer. Verify shows you the disagreement instead of hiding it.
2. API accessible — meaning it can plug into AI moderation, auto-rewrites, labeling systems, etc.
In a world flooded with AI-generated content, maybe what we really need isn’t just more answers, but clearer signals about uncertainty.
18.7. klo 09.15
I tried it today~
This diagram shows the verification results of Mira's Verify system on a piece of AI-produced content.
Each clause is independently judged by multiple validators, and is marked in green or red when the results are consistent, and gray if there is no consensus
It can be seen from the diagram that the diagram is marked with true and false, and there is a type of gray sentence, which is inconsistent with each other's judgments.
This category is actually the most common, but the least proposed.
Mira's Verify system is a lower-level solution, and I think this design has two meanings:
1. More in line with the real world: Most of the controversial information is not absolutely right or wrong, but a lack of consensus. Verify does not evade uncertainty and will directly mark that there is no consensus.
2. Technically callable: Verify provides APIs that can directly access scenarios such as AI review, automatic regeneration, and content tagging.
In this era of content generated by AI models. I think what we might need is more than just more answers, but a more explicit "uncertain".
@MiraNetworkCN
@Mira_Network
2,1K
Gmira(3/3)
Tried out Mira’s Verify system — pretty interesting.
It breaks down AI-generated content sentence by sentence, and runs each through multiple validators.
•If they agree, it’s marked green (true) or red (false).
•If they disagree, it’s gray — no consensus.
What stood out to me: the gray ones are actually the most common, but rarely talked about.
Most AI outputs aren’t clearly right or wrong — they just sit in that uncertain middle ground.
Verify feels more like infra than just a tool. Two things I liked:
mirrors the real world — not everything has a yes/no answer. Verify shows you the disagreement instead of hiding it.
2.API accessible — meaning it can plug into AI moderation, auto-rewrites, labeling systems, etc.
In a world flooded with AI-generated content, maybe what we really need isn’t just more answers, but clearer signals about uncertainty.
18.7. klo 09.15
I tried it today~
This diagram shows the verification results of Mira's Verify system on a piece of AI-produced content.
Each clause is independently judged by multiple validators, and is marked in green or red when the results are consistent, and gray if there is no consensus
It can be seen from the diagram that the diagram is marked with true and false, and there is a type of gray sentence, which is inconsistent with each other's judgments.
This category is actually the most common, but the least proposed.
Mira's Verify system is a lower-level solution, and I think this design has two meanings:
1. More in line with the real world: Most of the controversial information is not absolutely right or wrong, but a lack of consensus. Verify does not evade uncertainty and will directly mark that there is no consensus.
2. Technically callable: Verify provides APIs that can directly access scenarios such as AI review, automatic regeneration, and content tagging.
In this era of content generated by AI models. I think what we might need is more than just more answers, but a more explicit "uncertain".
@MiraNetworkCN
@Mira_Network
260
Johtavat
Rankkaus
Suosikit