There looks like there is no five-vote majority at the Supreme Court on President Trump’s tariffs as it does not issue a ruling for the 3d straight time. The Court needs at least five justices aligned on a rationale. Repeated denials often mean the Court is waiting for a “cleaner” case. The Court may end up saying: “If this delegation of tariff power to the Executive Branch is a problem, Congress must fix it.” This fits a broader pattern: the Court often avoids trade and foreign-affairs disputes unless Congress clearly reasserts itself. Some conservatives are wary of unchecked executive power. Others are reluctant to weaken national-security discretion. The Court could be intentionally avoiding a politically and institutionally risky ruling where no stable majority exists—and where Congress has the power to act but hasn’t. @x @SCOTUSblog @USSupremeCourt @FoxBusiness @FoxNews @WhiteHouse @realDonaldTrump