社群通話在24小時內 🎙 我們已延長註冊時間，以幫助每個人申請，同時增加符合資格的X創作者的空投配額。 留下你的問題，並收聽2025年最後一次社群AMA，以獲得如何最大化你的獎勵的絕對清晰度 🔥

Thought Experiment: Time and again, I keep hearing from folks in the Polygon trading community that MATIC was a far stronger and more familiar ticker — it had history, recognition, and stuck in people’s minds. So here’s an honest question: should we ask exchanges to revert just the ticker back to MATIC? My stance so far has been: it’s too much churn. We migrated to POL, let’s stick to it — enough people know it now, specially on CT. But the counter-argument I keep getting is: “the guy in the Philippines running a sari-sari store, or an Uber driver in Dubai, knew MATIC… and now he has no idea where it went.” And that, projects shouldn’t be making decisions based on what CT thinks — it represents <5% of total crypto trading population. I’m genuinely curious what the broader community thinks, because this feedback keeps coming up. No guarantees that exchanges would even agree to a revert — but who knows, it might be a trivial update on their end.