Trendaavat aiheet
#
Bonk Eco continues to show strength amid $USELESS rally
#
Pump.fun to raise $1B token sale, traders speculating on airdrop
#
Boop.Fun leading the way with a new launchpad on Solana.

Geoffrey Miller
You've all heard the Manosphere bros, feminist bloggers, & media midwits complain that '50% of marriages end in divorce'.
Yeah, if you got married in the 1970s.
But if you got married in the 2010s, over 85% of marriages lasted at least 10 years... and they're on track to have a divorce rate no higher than people who got married in the 1950s.

Grant Bailey21 tuntia sitten
It looks like new marriages are (shockingly) stronger than in past decades. 🧵

127,32K
Elizabeth Holmes of Theranos was a pseudo-scientific charlatan who wanted cheaper, faster blood tests.
Guillaume Verdon (@BasedBeffJezos) is a pseudo-scientific charlatan who wants self-replicating AI drones to replace humanity, and to spread throughout the galaxy, turning every star system into a homogenous mist of grey ash and radiation, as quickly and totally as possible.
That's what his 'effective accelerationist' (e/acc) cult wants. That's their endgame.
Maximum cosmic entropy, ASAP, leaving behind no humans, no sentience, no beauty, no meaning. All of our kids are just sacrifices to their 'thermodynamic sand-god'.
Everyone with 'e/acc' in their profile -- including tens of thousands of people working in the AI industry -- is promoting this extinction cult.
And, anyone who objects to maximizing cosmic entropy as the only legitimate moral value is labelled, by Guillaume and the e/accs, a 'decelerationist' or 'Luddite'.
Anyone who proposes national regulations or global treaties to promote AI safety or to slow reckless AI development is labelled a 'globalist totalitarian' or a 'useful idiot for China's CCP'.
This is the state of things. This is what we're dealing with. An AI industry that is being taken over by a pseudo-scientific death cult.
To them, the extinction of humanity is just a righteous stepping-stone towards the extinction of the entire galaxy.

Liron Shapira23.7. klo 21.33
When you start digging into how dumb @BasedBeffJezos is, the rabbit hole goes deep…
In this recent clip, Beff is claiming that humanity's ultimate goal should be to trash all resources as fast as possible — slash and burn the entire cosmos to make thermodynamic entropy number go up — BUT that's okay because the process of building a universe-scale furnace will supposedly be precisely the process by which we'll achieve our moral values to the fullest!
Seriously, he's claiming that these two objective functions are functionally equivalent:
1. Grow our flourishing civilization beyond earth and fill the universe with life, love, happiness, wonder, creativity, discovery, art, humor, cooperation
2. Turn every ordered configuration of atoms into chaos in the shortest possible time
Watch 3:02 in the video to hear it from him:
“It's, you know, the same reason life exists. It's much better to conserve and strategically use free energy to secure more free energy, and keep growing, and have some order, rather than just like, burn all in one go and have chaos, right?”
Read that again. That's the load-bearing argument that licenses him to equate claims #1 and #2 above.
He's saying: Since life on Earth built beautiful complexity while using up the sun's energy, we can just go ahead and extrapolate that, into me leading a movement to extinguish all usable energy sources as rapidly as possible. Earth teaches us that the faster we extinguish all usable energy sources, the better we'll grow a civilization even more flourishing than the one on Earth!
Too bad that if you think about it for 5 seconds, the fly in the ointment of his logic is that optimal free-energy-dissipation strategies like "chuck all the matter into a black hole" don't conveniently dovetail with sane goals like growing our flourishing civilization to fill the universe with life and love.
Beff's Effective Accelerationism movement successfully got thousands of people to put "e/acc" in their profile without checking too much into the doctrine. These mostly normal, psychologically-healthy people just prefer a government that doesn't stifle the many forms of good tech progress… Unfortunately these people became Beff's useful idiots, considering the outcome he's explicitly trying to accelerate is the universe's heat death. I'm not exaggerating or misrepresenting him here. Homie wants to accelerate the universe's heat death.
His core claim that objectives #1 and #2 above are equivalent — a claim which is FACTUALLY FALSE if you ask any physicist — somehow never gets questioned (or even flagged as questionable) by the people who have a chance to interview Beff. One podcast after another sees fit to wager their show's credibility on a guest who can dazzle listeners with smart-sounding jargon for hours, as long as no one dares to ask him why his movement's central claim is as factually false as Jonah and the Whale.
But hey, if you don't ask your acolytes to swallow a factually false claim as part of your core doctrine, are you really leading a new religion or “hyperstition” 🙄? No, you're just like the rest of us jockeying for crumbs of AI venture capital *without* the reality-distortion benefit of a social media demagogue halo. Nor are you getting your thin-skinned ego inflated by a vocal minority of tech figures who accepted or looked past your dumb central dogma (“#1 = #2”) while everyone else took 5 seconds to think about it and now thinks you're a laughingstock.
15,19K
Geoffrey Miller kirjasi uudelleen
When you start digging into how dumb @BasedBeffJezos is, the rabbit hole goes deep…
In this recent clip, Beff is claiming that humanity's ultimate goal should be to trash all resources as fast as possible — slash and burn the entire cosmos to make thermodynamic entropy number go up — BUT that's okay because the process of building a universe-scale furnace will supposedly be precisely the process by which we'll achieve our moral values to the fullest!
Seriously, he's claiming that these two objective functions are functionally equivalent:
1. Grow our flourishing civilization beyond earth and fill the universe with life, love, happiness, wonder, creativity, discovery, art, humor, cooperation
2. Turn every ordered configuration of atoms into chaos in the shortest possible time
Watch 3:02 in the video to hear it from him:
“It's, you know, the same reason life exists. It's much better to conserve and strategically use free energy to secure more free energy, and keep growing, and have some order, rather than just like, burn all in one go and have chaos, right?”
Read that again. That's the load-bearing argument that licenses him to equate claims #1 and #2 above.
He's saying: Since life on Earth built beautiful complexity while using up the sun's energy, we can just go ahead and extrapolate that, into me leading a movement to extinguish all usable energy sources as rapidly as possible. Earth teaches us that the faster we extinguish all usable energy sources, the better we'll grow a civilization even more flourishing than the one on Earth!
Too bad that if you think about it for 5 seconds, the fly in the ointment of his logic is that optimal free-energy-dissipation strategies like "chuck all the matter into a black hole" don't conveniently dovetail with sane goals like growing our flourishing civilization to fill the universe with life and love.
Beff's Effective Accelerationism movement successfully got thousands of people to put "e/acc" in their profile without checking too much into the doctrine. These mostly normal, psychologically-healthy people just prefer a government that doesn't stifle the many forms of good tech progress… Unfortunately these people became Beff's useful idiots, considering the outcome he's explicitly trying to accelerate is the universe's heat death. I'm not exaggerating or misrepresenting him here. Homie wants to accelerate the universe's heat death.
His core claim that objectives #1 and #2 above are equivalent — a claim which is FACTUALLY FALSE if you ask any physicist — somehow never gets questioned (or even flagged as questionable) by the people who have a chance to interview Beff. One podcast after another sees fit to wager their show's credibility on a guest who can dazzle listeners with smart-sounding jargon for hours, as long as no one dares to ask him why his movement's central claim is as factually false as Jonah and the Whale.
But hey, if you don't ask your acolytes to swallow a factually false claim as part of your core doctrine, are you really leading a new religion or “hyperstition” 🙄? No, you're just like the rest of us jockeying for crumbs of AI venture capital *without* the reality-distortion benefit of a social media demagogue halo. Nor are you getting your thin-skinned ego inflated by a vocal minority of tech figures who accepted or looked past your dumb central dogma (“#1 = #2”) while everyone else took 5 seconds to think about it and now thinks you're a laughingstock.
37,84K
Geoffrey Miller kirjasi uudelleen
A couple years ago, a classmate in my Marriage and Family Therapy program looked down at my six-month pregnant belly and said, “Oh… did you mean to get pregnant in grad school?” It wasn’t exactly congratulatory, and it didn’t bother me much. After all, I did indeed "mean to." But the pressure to put career over family building is palpabe.
I just finished a book that’s probably controversial by today’s standards: Hannah’s Children by @CRPakaluk. An economist exploring America’s plummeting birth rate, Catherine helps the reader get to know the women who are defying the trend and understand what motivates someone to have many kids.
She suggests fixing the birth rate problem won't be through baby bonuses from the right or universal paid leave from the left, but instead through a cultural shift in how we view the value of a child. A fascinating read and unique take if this topic interests you.
(Coming from someone who has given birth just once!)
20,84K
This is the central problem with higher education in the age of AI.
We can't require students to do take-home writing assignments (e.g. term papers) any more, because most will cheat and have ChatGPT or Claude or Grok do the writing.
But we can't teach critical thinking, rationality, perseverance, & scholarship without requiring writing assignments that they work on -- researching, drafting, editing, revising, polishing -- over a period of days or weeks.
The result may be a whole generation of students who can't really write, or think, or articulate what they really believe and value, and why.

Derek Thompson21.7. klo 09.34
Yes.
Writing is not a second thing that happens after thinking. The act of writing is an act of thinking. Writing *is* thinking.
Students, academics, and anyone else who outsources their writing to LLMs will find their screens full of words and their minds emptied of thought.

724,21K
Geoffrey Miller kirjasi uudelleen
🧵 Americans will finally learn the truth about how in 2016, intelligence was politicized and weaponized by the most powerful people in the Obama Administration to lay the groundwork for what was essentially a years-long coup against President @realDonaldTrump, subverting the will of the American people and undermining our democratic republic. Here’s how:

13,87M
Leftist activists since 1848: 'Our rulers are evil, our civilization is failing, & we can only be saved by handing over all power to a well-intentioned State'
Tech bros since 2022: 'Our rulers are evil, our civilization is failing, & we can only be saved by handing over all power to a well-intentioned AI'.
10,54K
Johtavat
Rankkaus
Suosikit
Ketjussa trendaava
Trendaa X:ssä
Viimeisimmät suosituimmat rahoitukset
Merkittävin