The issue is not the lack of “right-wing art” but the infrastructure of reception to interpret art, media, culture and society from that lens and instill a generative discourse to feed back into it, and document it; without which our contemporary avant-garde goes unseen & unheard

The question is not “what is right wing art”? Any authentic art today must be “right wing”, as far as the right is now defined as a rejection of the left, and as the left is defined as the institutionalized ideology shared by media & academia; which the avant-garde must exist by definition outside of, and as far as institutional art has lost all its vigor and relevancy, art is to be found in the avant-garde, then the question is only: can an avant-garde exist without a discourse to receive it? Not perceivably except by its direct participants— the lost generation of criticism, folded into a shameless PR arm of the gallery system, is responsible for the lost generation of art.