🚨 For those who are still in doubt, this is the U.S. Copyright Office's official opinion on the COPYRIGHTABILITY of AI-generated works: "The Office concludes that, given current generally available technology, prompts alone do not provide sufficient human control to make users of an AI system the authors of the output. Prompts essentially function as instructions that convey unprotectible ideas. While highly detailed prompts could contain the user’s desired expressive elements, at present, they do not control how the AI system processes them in generating the output." (page 18) Let's recap: - Any copyright claim involving AI must demonstrate HUMAN control over creative elements. - The assessment is done on a case-by-case basis. - AI-assisted is NOT the same as AI-generated. - AI-generated works without any HUMAN creative intervention are NOT copyrightable. - For some reason, every time I write about this tipic here or in my newsletter, some people get angry and try to deny the information above. I wonder why... Make sure to share the report with friends so they know what to expect in the U.S. - 👉 Link to the full report below 👉 To learn more about AI's legal and ethical challenges, join my newsletter's 91,700+ subscribers below.