Selling and buying a house is a personal freedom, but whether it results in profit or loss is determined by the government. I would like to say a few words about the debate surrounding housing, especially multiple home ownership. There is no need to pressure politicians to sell or not sell just because they own multiple homes or non-residential properties. There is also no need to talk about moral obligations like 'as a high-ranking official, you should sell first.' In a capitalist society, people accumulate houses because they can make money from them; if they couldn't make money, no one would pray and hold ceremonies to accumulate houses. They accumulate houses because they can profit from them. The problem is not with those who accumulate houses or those who do not sell, but with the government that has created taxes, finance, and regulations that make buying houses profitable. Ultimately, the issue lies not with the speculators but with the politicians and government that have created a system that allows speculation. (Of course, if there are politicians who create such systems to gain speculative profits and use them for speculation, they would indeed be very bad people.) If the national system regarding taxes, finance, and regulations had been designed to make real estate speculation impossible, then owning many houses or holding onto houses that one does not intend to live in, and living in ultra-expensive homes would not yield economic benefits but rather create burdens corresponding to side effects, and speculation in real estate would not occur. This government’s encouragement of the sale of multiple homes or investment non-residential properties is not about demanding moral obligations. It is to provide those who have profited from the government’s failures and negligence with an opportunity to avoid unjust blows and damage. This is also a way to reduce social costs. Unlike before, in the future, taxes, finance, and regulations will be thoroughly designed to ensure that choices similar to those of the past result in losses. And despite any unjust resistance and slander, it will be implemented unwaveringly to provide opportunities for new rational choices. Singapore, despite its small territory and a per capita income close to $100,000, does not suffer from real estate speculation nor does it hinder national development. It shows that speculation can be effectively restrained with just the government's will. Once again, I emphasize that buying and selling houses is a personal freedom, but whether it results in profit or loss is determined by the government. Housing speculation robs young people of hope and destroys the country. I believe that the sovereign people have entrusted me with the duty and authority to correct this national disaster of speculation. As a loyal public servant of the sovereign people, I will resolutely address this national disaster of speculation according to the people's mandate. ...