We are seeing increasing evidence that the account @rainmaker1973 changed it's style within the last year. Looking at the language style and interaction method, there are stark differences between the account today and the account that once earned the admiration of Elon Musk. Here's what has changed 1. New 2025-behavior: Insulting People Without Provocation Recent replies from@Rainmaker1973include unprovoked insults, especially toward critics. Examples from December 2025:Calling users - "ret@rd," - "id!ot," or - "clown" (e.g., "Sad that you don't have a brain, ret@rd"). Responses like "Your mom is a bot, ret@ard" or "BLOCK AND REPORT this id!ot, so he can understand what being buried by the algorithm means." In one thread: "Everyone please block and report this id!ot." This appears tied to defensiveness over corrections. There was no similar language in older posts (pre-2025), where tone was more informative/neutral. 2. New Behaviors Not in Community Spirit: Rage-Blocking + Rage-Reposting)Rage-blocking As noted above, blocks are frequent and public, often announced in replies (e.g., "BLOCKED you id!ot ret@rd"). Users describe it as "rage-blocking" critics en masse. Rage-reposting: The account has reposted identical content multiple times in short periods, especially after backlash.Example: The Bitcoin mining post was deleted and reposted at least 3–4 times within 24 hours on December 29, 2025, each time drawing ratios and community notes for inaccuracies (e.g., "Which version of this post is this? ...you block everyone and repost"). Users commented: "Did you delete the post and then re-post the same thing?" and "Every time you do it it gets fact checked and you get ratio'd into oblivion. Then you block everyone and repost." This contrasts with earlier "community spirit" (e.g., curating wonder/science without confrontation); recent posts emphasize self-defense (e.g., "This account has been attacked like few others"). 3. Complaints about declining quality, accuracy, and use of citations Multiple Sources on X in 2025 have explicitly noted a perceived drop in post quality, often citing factual inaccuracies, sensationalism, or repetition. Examples: - "The quality of your posts have gone down so badly. I remember when Elon hailed this account as one of the best... But these days it posts garbage." - "You are really getting worse. Less quantity, more quality." - "Out of what sample of dances? Link to study? ...quality of stuff you post...has quite declined unfortunately." ...