The key to the success of Flipster @flipster_io's Dynamic Earn is not the "yield" but the "trust structure". Currently, this is the cumulative yield of my deposit of 100 USDT, which started on January 28. You can see that it has decreased compared to the first day's earnings when I first posted. Today, I would like to share my experiences and what is needed for Dynamic Earn to further develop in the future. The core of the success or failure of Flipster's Dynamic Earn product lies not in how high the yield is, but in how honestly and consistently the fluctuating yield structure is explained and managed. Looking at the current global environment, the direction of Dynamic Earn itself is very reasonable. Personally, I believe that regulatory authorities in various countries are becoming increasingly sensitive to structures that promise fixed returns, and that "interest-guaranteed products" at CEXs like Flipster are likely to lose their place amid securities controversies. In this flow, a structure where returns vary according to market conditions and strategic performance can be seen as a more realistic alternative. The issue here is not the structure itself, but the user perception of accepting this structure. Currently, the biggest risk of Flipster's Dynamic Earn starts from "product misunderstanding". Many users still unconsciously associate the word "Earn" with a stability similar to deposits. The fact that it is USDT-based further reinforces this perception. (I also had this feeling until I read the detailed explanation carefully.) However, Dynamic Earn is essentially a variable yield structure. When market volatility increases or strategic performance fluctuates, the yield may decrease, and temporarily unsatisfactory results may occur. This is where the problem arises. It is not that the product is wrong, but that the expectations were set incorrectly from the beginning. The moment the returns fluctuate unexpectedly, users will feel that "the promise has been broken" rather than "I did not understand the product structure". This point is the starting point where trust is damaged. What are the conditions for Dynamic Earn to survive in the long term? For Dynamic Earn to establish itself as a long-term product based on trust rather than a temporary inflow product, three things are essential. First, the yield structure must be explained in "stories" rather than numbers. (And it should be done regularly and very simply.) What is more important than the APR percentage is where the returns come from, under what circumstances the returns may decrease, and how those risks are managed. The more this structure is explained repeatedly in easy language that users can understand, the yield fluctuations will become a "volatility" that users can comprehend rather than a "risk". Second, the principles regarding withdrawals and liquidity must remain unwavering. A structure that is fast under normal circumstances but changes conditions only when the market is volatile breeds the greatest distrust. The possibility of withdrawal delays, processing times, and exceptional conditions must be clearly communicated in advance and consistently applied based on rules in actual operations. --> Based on Flipster's current operating methods, I am not overly concerned about this part, but I mention it because it is still very important. Third, it is necessary to avoid short-term high-yield competition. Strategies that attract funds with high APRs are quick, but we have seen that such funds are the first to leave when yields drop. Dynamic Earn should not be an event-based product but rather a quietly maintained product over the long term. ...