Going from Epstein trafficking women to Trump to a new theory of Epstein trafficking Trump himself.

I know he was convicted of horrendous crimes, but something about this man's face makes me trust him.

Fox News has published an op-ed by Ned Price, former Biden official, accusing Tulsi Gabbard of engaging in "revisionist history" about the 2016 election. He writes: Hers is an effort to re-write history, overturning established facts with conspiratorial fiction, while also directing focus away from the current scandal engulfing her administration and, in particular, her boss and political benefactor, President Trump. It’s a history that I know well as a CIA officer who was serving in a senior role on President Obama’s National Security Council at the time. Key part of the op-ed Gabbard’s deceit, however, comes into view when she contrasts this judgment with the assessment of Moscow’s well-documented influence campaign. By leveraging social media bots, paid ads, and propaganda outlets, Moscow, according to the intelligence community, sought to denigrate Clinton’s campaign and bolster Trump’s. Gabbard calls this finding "false" and goes on to argue that previous analyses had "stated clearly that Russia ‘did not impact’ the election through cyber hacks on the election." The willful distortion is obvious: attempts to "influence" voters through information operations and an effort to alter their votes through disruptive or destructive "hacking" are two very different things. Further undermining Gabbard’s case is the fact that others with access to the same set of classified information came to the same conclusion as the January 2017 assessment. For example, the Senate Intelligence Committee on a bipartisan basis formally concluded during Trump’s first term that Russian agents undertook a broader effort to "influence the 2016 presidential election by harming Hillary Clinton’s chances of success and supporting Donald Trump at the direction of the Kremlin." Among the Senators behind this report was the current Secretary of State Marco Rubio. Someone at Fox, which is not completely MAGAfied in terms of its news coverage, is honest enough to see through the crude White House propaganda. Pay attention to who is falling for this. It reflects very poorly on them.

Germany: We can’t have reproductive technology and widespread surrogacy because of the Holocaust. Israel: lol

Republicans in Congress sure have developed some interesting political priorities.

“See you don’t get it. I follow Carl Schmitt. There’s this thing called the friend-enemy distinction. Maybe you’ve heard of it? Wait my enemies just fired me? Come on guys! Whatever happened to free speech and all those liberal values we hold dear? What’s the world coming to?”

Ben Shapiro cites Michael Tracey, tells Bannon to release the 15 hours of Epstein interviews he recorded. I don’t think there are Epstein conspiracies to unlock. But if this story can discredit Bannon, one of the worst people in politics, it would be good for the world.

The Jeffrey Epstein conspiracy theories seem to stem from the fact that few people want to admit the obvious reality that a lot of women will claim to have been molested if they can get fame and money out of it.

If you think Michael Tracey and I are wrong on Epstein conspiracy theories being nonsense, join us in three hours to discuss. You can set a reminder here. We’ll discuss how trustworthy these “victims” are.

People with far right views try to debate outside their bubble, it doesn’t go well. They think they’re shut out of academic and journalistic institutions due to a leftist conspiracy, it’s more that they’re going off primitive instinct and can’t rationally defend their positions.