In fact, if you think about this question from a different perspective, you can also arrive at an answer... X's revenue sources are advertising and Premium subscriptions, with the former accounting for the majority and the latter being a smaller portion. The main venue for advertising is concentrated in the comments section, so what kind of content can generate a lot of comments while also attracting people to want to read the comments? Such content is what the algorithm engine prioritizes for recommendation. So, if you write a serious long article, but others are too lazy to comment regardless of whether they finish reading it, then even if your content is very professional, it may not get recommended. For example, tweets that post a picture and ask @grok to edit it naturally entice people to open the comments section, so this kind of content often gets a million views. It's not that the image content is really that attractive, but rather that people, after seeing the tweet, are curious about the outcome. Then, as more people open the comments section, the algorithm will continue to recommend it to more people, thus creating a positive feedback loop. I am not suggesting that everyone should use this method to gain traffic, but rather to understand a principle: It’s not just good content that gets traffic, but content that can provoke effective interaction in the comments section that will gain traffic. In other words, if two people are doing technical analysis on BTC, one is rigidly analyzing prices and points, while the other is using humorous analogies, the former will be scrolled past after reading, while the latter will make people want to add a few more comments, or even feel the desire to oppose with different viewpoints. Which one gets more traffic is obvious...