Determining whether a platform can go far actually boils down to a very practical question: how does it make money, and is it reasonable? Many NFT markets initially attract users with subsidies, but once they start charging fees, the experience changes drastically. @spaace_io has a more restrained fee structure; it doesn't hide costs in places you can't see. With a Transparent Fee Structure + Dynamic Fee Adjustment, the fees for each transaction are clear and predictable, and they adjust dynamically based on market activity and liquidity, rather than being a "one-size-fits-all" approach. This is crucial for frequent traders, as you can calculate in advance whether the operation is worth it, rather than discovering post-transaction that the costs exceeded expectations. More importantly, the platform's revenue isn't just taken away; it flows back to participants and the ecosystem through a Revenue Redistribution Mechanism. This means that fees are no longer just a loss but rather serve to power the entire market. The money you pay doesn't simply disappear into the platform's accounts. The underlying logic of this business model is quite simple: the platform needs to survive, but it can't do so by squeezing users. Spaace seems to be trying to tie "platform revenue" and "user activity" together, rather than making them oppositional. When a project dares to lay out its revenue model clearly instead of just discussing visions, it at least shows that it has a plan for the long term. Whether it can grow is another matter, but whether it can last often hinges on this point. @spaace_io @Bantr_fun @wallchain @cookiedotfun #Bantr #CookieDotFun #Wallchain