I have been watching the developments of the investigation into TPUSA, and I think that the financial records are a red herring. Here’s why: - Killing Charlie is too extreme of an action to cover up a much less serious crime. - Charlie was killed publicly to make a show of it. Totally unnecessary if the murderer is in his inner circle. The method of killing was meant to send a message. - If you want to get away with something, why do something that brings the most attention possible? - A lot of the content I’ve seen relies on people’s ignorance about how charities work. Yes, their finances are wonky - that’s pretty typical for how the industry operates. - some of the investigations are being done by leftists with an agenda, claiming to be non-partisan. - odd activities like the sermon video being deleted in realtime, or the bot raid on @IanCarrollShow stream, are ineffective but overt — it’s meant to convince you you’re onto something when you’re not. - If it was sparked by his announcement of the Internal “DOGE” audit, that’s only 8 days to plan and execute the murder. It’s out of sync with all the other evidence of pre-planning. There may be some evidence of corruption in TPUSA, and it may overlap with the assassination, but in my opinion, trying to audit the public filings of TPUSA is missing the forest for the trees. The way that Zionist political forces are clearly infiltrating Christian faith movements to manipulate them for the own ends is an important discussion, but don’t forget we are talking about a young father gunned down in public. There have been thousands of cases of financial corruption in political or faith organizations, rarely do they ever inspire such brutal violence. I could elaborate on all these things, but I wanted to just put this out there while I’m thinking about it.