$NB2 出售其比特幣挖礦單位,交易金額為 2 億美元,並附帶一個大額的獲利條件,但不會透露對方是誰。 如果這裡有任何關聯方的角度,保密會加大風險。 獲利條件 + 保密 ≠ 最佳實踐。治理很重要。 公開買方!
matthew sigel, recovering CFA
matthew sigel, recovering CFA2025年8月21日
$NB2 is down 25% since $RUM’s related-party “takeunder” bid. Tether owns ~54% of NB2 and ~48% of RUM. The proposal assumes Peak Mining is sold (MOU signed for up to $235m) and the cash is used to repay part of a ~€600m loan Northern Data owes to Tether, before minorities are asked to swap into RUM stock at a discount rather than a premium. But even ex-Peak, NB2’s Cloud + Taiga business looks very cheap on EV/Sales and EV/EBITDA vs. $CRWV, $NBIS, $WYFI and others. VanEck is already the #3 shareholder of $NB2 via one of our passive ETFs and we’ve also initiated a small position in $NODE after the selloff. The deal would require shareholder and regulator approval, and minorities can pursue appraisal or fairness proceedings if terms remain inadequate. Disclosure is lacking: the IR deck hasn’t been updated since a Capital Markets Day more than a year ago, and IR does not return our calls. Other Tether-backed firms ($RUM, $AGRO) face similar gaps in communications and low liquidity, and the stocks have struggled. Unless the goal is to pick up NB2 on the cheap, more transparency is needed on the underlying business and the rationale for this possible deal. We are watching.
我們之前在這裡見過交叉擁有權的問題(RUM/NB2/Tether)。與匿名對手的收益分成需要更多的透明度。
30.06K