Many think this. Many are wrong. I'll tell you why, then I'll show you with live examples. TLDR → Network effects are a thing and, unlike SaaS, blockchains build up history/state that cannot be taken. → Iteration pace of financial systems (chains) is muuuuuch slower because of risks. → Most of this tech is novel and scaling is multi-factorial, which requires solving net-new challenges across verticals ------------------------------------------- Now let me show you what this looks like in practice with the 2 leading blockchains: Base and Solana 1. Base. Base has been wanting to scale massively for YEARS. This is a quote from Jesse in December of 2024 proclaiming they would "scale base another 100x with reth" and alluding to it coming in 2025. Base Throughput: Dec. 19, 2024: 18 Mgas/s Feb. 6, 2026: 30 Mgas/s (!) It's not even a 2x. 2! When they strived for 100x. Literally 2% of the goal. The implementation of Reth hasn't been mentioned since that post so I have no idea the state. "Yea, but Bread, rollups have been cucked by Ethereum DA capacity it's not their fault." - You, probably. You would also be wrong. Rollups haven't been held back Ethereum for over half a year - it's all self imposed scale. ...