Regarding Dan's attention to Finn, I have a few points to make: 1. If Dan is only looking to take coins in the short term, then there is a high probability he will be drained in the short term. 2. If Dan just wants to take without wanting to bear any responsibility, then it is very likely that the 1 on BSC will experience a retaliatory surge, ultimately resetting emotions and liquidity to zero through a fix. (I've seen too many operations like this with bags recently) 3. If Dan takes the coins and chooses to actually participate in building this ticker, then we can only see how the subsequent execution and the market will evaluate it; time will provide the answer. In my personal opinion, the narrative of 1 does not actually need to overly rely on the author himself. The narrative that truly stands now is the core of the article + the layered Buff of the multiple meanings of "1" itself, and not just what a single person has assigned to it. The author can be a catalyst, but once the narrative takes shape, it should not belong solely to the author.