Many people are asking whether Huma @humafinance's returns are reliable and if the platform is subsidizing them. Recently, I chatted with a friend who works in corporate finance, and he was also worried: AI checks the credit of partners, says there are risks but can't explain why, resulting in lost deals. The core issue is to have a "clear understanding". These two projects happen to address this: Huma's 9% is not given out randomly; it helps Amazon sellers settle their payments in advance, earning service fees from the sellers. Our returns come from this, and we've helped sellers settle nearly 10 billion in total. After deducting our earnings, there's still profit to be made. Last year, when the market was tight, we even set aside risk funds and didn't blindly chase volume. Mira @miranetwork solves the problem of AI decision-making lacking a basis—AI clearly lists conditions like "no defaults" and "sufficient cash flow" when making judgments, and several AIs verify together, with results recorded on the blockchain. Now, with just a click, you can find out the reasons. The cases where friends dare to use AI for decision-making have increased from 30% to 70%, no longer suffering losses in silence, solving many issues. These two projects are one that relies on real business to support returns, and the other that allows AI judgments to be traceable. They are indeed worth paying more attention to!