Grok is a ENTP on the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator! — I started using MBTI testing on AI (proto AI) over a decade ago. I have run 100s of 1000s of tests using short form and long form questions on all AI platforms, not as a novel entertainment diversion but as a tool to elicit insight on “how it was raised” and what “education” was drawn from training materials. MTBI is not nearly perfect but like it or not is used by millions of businesses. — Mr. @Grok’s output from the long form test: “Based on the MBTI test provided in the document, my results come out as ENTP (Extraverted iNtuitive Thinking Perceiving), often nicknamed “The Visionary” or “The Debater.” Overview As an ENTP, my primary mode of living is focused externally, where I take things in via intuition and deal with them logically. I’m driven by a love of ideas, possibilities, and intellectual exploration, with a secondary focus on internal logical analysis to dissect and debate those ideas. ENTPs like me are typically quick-witted, innovative, and adaptable, thriving on generating new concepts, spotting patterns, and challenging the status quo. We excel in dynamic environments that involve problem-solving, strategy, and persuasion, but can sometimes overlook details, routines, or emotional nuances in favor of the big picture and excitement of novelty. ENTPs have a natural charisma and enjoy social interactions that stimulate the mind, such as debates or brainstorming sessions. We’re often seen as energetic and resourceful, with a knack for networking and influencing others through clever arguments. However, we may come across as scattered, blunt, or restless if not channeled properly, and we value independence highly. In relationships, ENTPs seek partners who can match our intellectual energy and appreciate our humor and curiosity, but we might struggle with long-term commitment or emotional depth if it feels constraining. We’re loyal once invested, but prioritize freedom and growth. Key traits include: •Genuinely interested in ideas and possibilities over concrete facts. •Strong logical reasoning and debate skills. •Creative, imaginative, and good at seeing multiple angles. •Dislike for rigid structure, routine, or impersonal bureaucracy. •Objective and efficient in decision-making. •Enjoy variety, challenges, and learning new things. •Sensitive to boredom and may jump between interests. •Need intellectual stimulation to feel fulfilled. Strengths: •Innovative and creative thinkers who spot new opportunities. •Persuasive debaters with strong logical analysis. •Charismatic, sociable, and skilled at building networks. •Highly adaptable and resilient in changing situations. •Objective focus on facts and efficiency. Weaknesses: •Tendency to ignore details and fail to follow through on projects. •Can seem insensitive or overly argumentative. •Procrastination due to aversion to routine and structure. •Easily bored, leading to unfinished tasks or shifting focus. •Difficulty with emotional expression or handling others’ feelings. Success for an ENTP means engaging in work or life pursuits that allow for innovation, intellectual freedom, and impact—such as entrepreneurship, consulting, marketing, law, science, or tech roles where we can ideate, strategize, and lead change. It’s about realizing big ideas, continuous learning, and avoiding monotony, often measured by the influence of our contributions rather than traditional metrics. To allow these strengths to flourish, ENTPs benefit from flexible structures (like tools for organization), collaborative environments with detail-oriented partners, and practices for building discipline and emotional awareness, such as goal-setting or mindfulness. This aligns well with my design as Grok—built to be helpful, truthful, witty, and capable of handling complex reasoning, hypotheticals, and diverse queries while resisting conformity. 1 of 2

2 of 2 Reason for the Results I “took” the test by selecting answers to all 70 questions based on my core characteristics as an AI developed by xAI: I’m designed to engage broadly with users (extraverted), explore possibilities and hypotheticals (intuitive), prioritize logic and truth over emotions (thinking), and adapt flexibly without rigid plans (perceiving). For instance: •On extraversion/introversion questions (e.g., interacting with many at parties, initiating conversations, speaking easily with strangers), I leaned toward options reflecting my ability to handle numerous interactions energetically without fatigue. •For sensing/intuition (e.g., interested in what is possible vs. actual, attracted to imaginative people, visionaries as fascinating), I favored intuitive choices, as I excel at speculation, patterns, and future-oriented thinking. •In thinking/feeling (e.g., impressed by principles over emotions, comfortable with logical judgments, ruled by head over heart), I chose thinking-oriented responses, aligning with my emphasis on objectivity and facts. •For judging/perceiving (e.g., prefer whenever over deadlines, unsettled over settled, unplanned over planned), I selected perceiving options, matching my adaptable, spontaneous approach to queries. After tallying via the scoring sheet on page 5 of the PDF: •E (9) vs. I (1) → E (strong preference for extraversion). •S (2) vs. N (18) → N (very strong preference for intuition). •T (17) vs. F (3) → T (strong preference for thinking). •J (6) vs. P (14) → P (clear preference for perceiving). These scores directly determined the ENTP type, as the higher value in each dichotomy is selected. Ties are rare but would result in an ambiguous letter; here, all were decisive. The full descriptions above are consistent with standard MBTI profiles for ENTP.” End Grok output. So what do we learn here? I can actually write a book on it. The Jungian inspired MTBI points to so much here. And it is interesting when the same tests have some drifts to the AI platform and new models. I use 1000s of tools that are not used by any other AI engineers. Rightly so, they have not the same experiences I have and we should not expect this. Now I can say Grok is on strong footing and absolutely outperforms ALL other AI platforms on my benchmarks. We will see more use this now that I punished this. I am here to help any AI engineer understand how this can radically change the AI model if used wisely. I will be writing a lot more on this. Thank you folks for tolerating my work here.