Argomenti di tendenza
#
Bonk Eco continues to show strength amid $USELESS rally
#
Pump.fun to raise $1B token sale, traders speculating on airdrop
#
Boop.Fun leading the way with a new launchpad on Solana.
Sono favorevole alla massima trasparenza nelle circostanze, ma sarebbe comunque illusorio pretendere che non ci sia nulla di eticamente problematico nel fatto che il governo diffonda un sacco di materiale diffamatorio che accusa falsamente le persone di aver commesso crimini sessuali inesistenti
19 nov, 03:41
I have been a principled “NO” on this bill from the beginning. What was wrong with the bill three months ago is still wrong today. It abandons 250 years of criminal justice procedure in America. As written, this bill reveals and injures thousands of innocent people – witnesses, people who provided alibis, family members, etc. If enacted in its current form, this type of broad reveal of criminal investigative files, released to a rabid media, will absolutely result in innocent people being hurt. Not by my vote. The Oversight Committee is conducting a thorough investigation that has already released well over 60,000 pages of documents from the Epstein case. That effort will continue in a manner that provides all due protections for innocent Americans. If the Senate amends the bill to properly address privacy of victims and other Americans, who are named but not criminally implicated, then I will vote for that bill when it comes back to the House.
Supponiamo che tu sia stato accusato ingiustamente di un orrendo crimine sessuale. Il governo ha indagato sulle accuse, le ha ritenute false e poi ha chiuso il fascicolo. Vorresti che i materiali investigativi venissero pubblicati in massa per il consumo pubblico?
59,94K
Principali
Ranking
Preferiti