Trendaavat aiheet
#
Bonk Eco continues to show strength amid $USELESS rally
#
Pump.fun to raise $1B token sale, traders speculating on airdrop
#
Boop.Fun leading the way with a new launchpad on Solana.

Jeffrey Hu
Head of Investment Research @HashKey_Capital , contributor of @bitcoinoptech⚡️ ⚛️ Opinions are my own.
Jeffrey Hu kirjasi uudelleen
🚨 Don’t miss our upcoming Space (in Chinese) as we dive into the Multi-Asset era — exploring the future of #Bitcoin and #LightningNetwork.
🗓️ Wed 23 Jul 2025, 8:30 PM UTC+8
📍 Set reminder:
💡Speakers
Darius
Co-Founder, Lnfi Network
@dariusnostr
Phyrex
Researcher
@Phyrex_Ni
Jeffery
Head of Investment Research, HashKey Capital
@jeffrey_hu
Pepper
RGB Asia Initiator
@off_thetarget
Luyi
Post-Investment Manager, Waterdrip Capital
@Laviscar_
@HashKey_Capital @waterdripfund

19,16K
To add a point regarding the Ice Frog boss: Last year, when discussing financing with @yalaorg, the team provided a document of over ten pages just for the GTM strategy and plans. It was impressive...
Preparation leads to success in everything.

冰蛙21.7. klo 11.09
Counting the track of Btcfi, most of this round is anti-dumping, especially those with large financing and high popularity, which have almost become negative teaching materials.
Users are attentive in operation and pragmatic in product promotion. The result is that the user's expectation management is targeted, and the incentive can form waves of small hotspots.
The project should learn from the failure experience of the previous hot start, high opening and low seed players, and be able to promote the business in a targeted and step-by-step manner, which may be Yala's core competitiveness.
21,94K
Jeffrey Hu kirjasi uudelleen
Recently, I've been researching the stock market and delving into SBET and UXPI, which are the treasury stocks of ETH and SOL, respectively. Behind them are our old friends, who have switched battlefields. What new tricks are these old pros playing now? I suddenly feel that the US stock market is quite friendly to retail investors; who is the big player, what is the cost price, how many shares are there, and sometimes even the target price is crystal clear. Of course, it seems these people also don't lock up... There is still about a 45-day buffer for declarations.
6,54K
Jeffrey Hu kirjasi uudelleen
Thrilled to join the @RGB_Protocol Association alongside visionary builders like @bitfinex and @planb_network, @FulgurVentures and others. Together, we’re forging the future of Bitcoin scalability & privacy through client-side validation.
RGB isn’t just a protocol—it’s the blueprint for DeFi, tokenisation, and sovereign digital identity on #Bitcoin. With #Lightning adoption soaring, this is the dawn of a new era.
5,5K
One detail is that the receiving address is bc1q (SegWit v0) instead of bc1p (P2TR).
After chatting about several quantum-resistant projects recently, my first reaction was that this miner was worried that P2TR would be threatened 😂 by quantum computing

0xTodd5.7. klo 13.53
The 80,000 bitcoin old miners woke up after 14 years of sleep, and everyone must have swiped it.
I was curious to pick up the address, in fact, there is currently [no direct evidence] that this is a miner from China.
To be honest, there were relatively few miners in China in 11 years, because at that time, not to mention Bitmain, even Pumpkin Zhang had not yet invented the Avalon mining machine, and the American butterfly mining machine had not come out (this was all in the middle of 2012), and the roast cat was still after.
And Chinese miners will start to dominate, at least until these ASIC miners are concentrated in China.
And I think most of the miner's transfers were made in the first half of 2011, when he was really in the idyllic stage of ordinary equipment mining envisioned by Satoshi Nakamoto.
And why is he most likely a miner? It's because he has a lot of behavior to aggregate block rewards.
These 50 BTC are all newly mined block rewards at that time, and they are pure bitcoins.
Then, another interesting point is that the old miner used Bitcoin addresses starting with 1, and now he has transferred them all to addresses starting with bc1.
So, what is the difference between addresses that start with 1, 3, bc1, and bc1p?
At the beginning of 1, Satoshi Nakamoto's earliest invention based on base58-based address, the classic skin.
PS: The so-called Base58, compared to Base64, Base58 does not use confusing letters, the number "0", the letter capital "O", the letter capital "I", and the letter lowercase "l", you can find it casually, Bitcoin address never includes these alphanumerics. See, Satoshi Nakamoto made a good amount of advance for us handicapped parties at that time.
After 2017, Segregated Witness (Segwit) was capped, which allowed Bitcoin to put some secondary transaction information outside the block, breaking through the 1MB block in disguise, and achieving soft scaling.
BC1 and 3.
As a result, the native address bc1 of the native Segregated Witness was born, and the transfer of BC1 to BC1 will make the transaction fee nearly half cheaper.
And in order to take care of the people who don't like SegWit, the forward compatible version was born, that is, the address that starts with 3, and the beginning of 3 is also lower than that of 1.
Due to the Segregated Witness, the fee is sorted by: BC1 > 3 > 1
In addition, the BC1 address is relatively more secure, not from the perspective of anti-cracking - the anti-cracking ability of these 3 addresses is the same, but that the BC1 address is more secure in terms of verification.
1. This bc1 address is all lowercase, which avoids the trouble of being case-sensitive for Bitcoin starting with 1 or 3.
2. This BC1 address has a better validation mechanism, which reduces the possibility of errors when entering the address. For example, if you mistakenly enter a bc1 address, the system is more likely to find and fix the error, while an address that starts with 1 or 3 is less likely to be validated.
As for the bc1p address, it is the address that supports Taproot, and Taproot I shared before that you can flip through it if you are interested.
---- Dividing Line----
From this point of view, it is also difficult for me to believe that the miner "went to jail".
Because if I were a jailed person and I had been out of touch with society for so long, I would probably choose an address that starts with 1, and it's hard to trust a bc1 address, even though it's safer.
Only those who have lived through the strife of the SegWit era will recognize SegWit, especially the native SegWit address, BC1.
Anyway, he has 8w bitcoins, and there is no difference in transaction fees at all.
Of course, these are just my guesses, and it is possible that the Bitcoin wallet he uses is bc1 by default.
It's just that I think the person who was interested in Bitcoin in 2011 was probably a geek. And this kind of geek, or early supporters of Bitcoin, has a political tendency towards Bitcoin. And using addresses that start with different ones is also part of the political spectrum that represents oneself in Bitcoin.
Of course, in the end, there is a simple hope 😂, hoping that he will just change to a better and more advanced address, instead of preparing to ship and leave.




5,57K
Sometimes I can really get poked at my (weird) laugh 🤣 by the ideas on the hackathon
For example, at bitcoin++ 2025 Austin's garbage man project
As I mentioned earlier about OP_RETURN tweets, people who want to send spam transactions can always find unlimited nodes like Libre Relay to forward to miners. But you can also choose to run a Knots node to filter out what you consider to be a spam, at least not forwarding.
Isn't there anything else you can't do? No
The garbage man's approach is to modify the Knots node to disguise it as a Libre Relay node and establish a connection to the node, pretending to forward various spam transactions, but in fact they will secretly throw them away and not forward them, just like a garbage worker dumps garbage. At present, the number of Knots nodes should be more than that of Libre Relay, so theoretically it will also reduce the probability of successful forwarding of Libre Relay.
10,09K
Johtavat
Rankkaus
Suosikit
Ketjussa trendaava
Trendaa X:ssä
Viimeisimmät suosituimmat rahoitukset
Merkittävin