Staking on @monad is no longer just “stake and wait” With @MagmaStaking, liquid staking is here… and Stakely already has its own gVault so you can actually put your $MON to work Here’s what’s going on and why it matters 🧵👇

@monad @MagmaStaking Quick context: @MagmaStaking is a liquid staking protocol on @monad Deposit $MON → receive $gMON A liquid asset representing your staking position 📊

@monad @MagmaStaking What’s different vs traditional staking? You don’t fully give up liquidity With $gMON you can: ✅ Keep staking exposure ✅ Use it across DeFi Same capital, more ways to use it 🙌

@monad @MagmaStaking $gMON isn’t just another token. It’s reward-bearing and non-rebasing: ✅ Your balance stays the same ✅ But each $gMON increases in value over time Cleaner for DeFi. Less accounting pain 🤝

@monad @MagmaStaking 💡 Important: liquid ≠ instant Even with $gMON, withdrawals are still asynchronous They depend on @monad’s unstaking process 👀

@monad @MagmaStaking Now the interesting part 👀 @MagmaStaking splits its architecture into two layers: ✅ Aggregated staking (CoreVault) ✅ Validator-specific exposure (gVaults)

@monad @MagmaStaking 1️⃣ CoreVault: The engine of the protocol ✅ Pools deposits ✅ Allocates across validators ✅ Handles rewards and withdrawals No manual decisions needed

@monad @MagmaStaking 2️⃣ $gVaults: This is where it gets interesting You get exposure to a specific validator, without fragmenting liquidity into multiple tokensz 💥

@monad @MagmaStaking So... you keep a single asset ($gMON) while choosing which validator you’re exposed to  Liquidity + choice = better design 🙌

@monad @MagmaStaking And yes, Stakely is live there 💥 We launched our own gVault in Magma from day one 1️⃣

@monad @MagmaStaking What this means for you: ✅ Liquid staking on @monad ✅ $gMON usable in DeFi ✅ Direct delegation to Stakely All without sacrificing flexibility 🙌