ADIN has two investment products in market. Platform: fund evaluation (for allocators) Fund: startup evaluation (for investors) Same research layer. Different entry points. Thread:

ADIN Platform scores venture funds across 6 weighted dimensions. Track record decomposition. Team backgrounds. Portfolio construction analysis. Risk mapping. Output: structured evaluation report in ~15 minutes. Target user: LPs, family offices, fund-of-funds.

ADIN Fund does startup due diligence. SEC filings. Competitive mapping. Revenue verification. Market sizing. Team research. Output: investment memo with explicit risk flags. Target user: VCs, operators, angels.

The architecture is identical. Both products run on the same intelligence stack: - Multi-source data integration - Structured synthesis - Risk decomposition - Preserved decision logic Different entry points. Same discipline.

Why build both? Capital allocation has the same information problem at every layer. Fragmented sources. Slow synthesis. Buried risk. We built the research layer once. Two products = two doors into the same system.