The following statements are correct: A Alpha no longer has 4x points. B The active market maker has finished work. C The project team has started selling after listing on BN. D It is a technical adjustment. E None of the above.

Recently, I've been frequently coming across funny videos that showcase life scenarios like dressing up pets, helping with kids, cooking, fishing, etc. These videos are quite humorous, contrasting with the deep philosophical discussions that ChatGPT initially sparked, and the stunning love letters written by AI. It seems that the early adopters of ChatGPT were mostly tech and internet professionals. When humans first encounter a tool that is somewhat human-like yet superior in many fields, the first instinct is to explore its capabilities, much like how we once sought to conquer nature, wondering where its limits lie and whether it can lead to a leap in productivity. The question is, do most people really need a 200% increase in productivity? Or, when everyone is competing for productivity, where is the demand matching? Perhaps, many are simply anxious about being replaced by better tools they don't use. My feeling is that most people don't lack tools; rather, they lack immediate emotional support that makes them feel seen, responded to, and understood. The consumer market has already proven this point. What users are actually doing with the products they use may be more important than ratings, capital gained, or traffic. As for whether building intimacy between humans and AI can further clarify human relationships is another new topic. What I hope is that Zhang Yiming is not just thinking about how many brand ads can be inserted into conversations after studying Doubao, but at least learns to be a bit more restrained like Zhang Xiaolong.