Currently, an article that is 80% AI-generated can achieve a million views, which is definitely bad news for Twitter, because Twitter is accurately defined as a social platform, not a content platform. If it were a content platform, then as long as the content is eye-catching and people are watching, it wouldn't matter whether it was created by a human or not. However, if it is a social platform, it must hope for genuine human thoughts—even if they are wrong. The significant difference between the high valuation of Xiaohongshu and the lack of views on Baijiahao is that the former prioritizes the "human touch," while the latter prioritizes a "dead feel." @nikitabier