CAUGHT WITH HER HAND IN THE COOKIE JAR! Climate activist Jessica Wentz (who is involved with the left-wing dark money funded Climate Judiciary Project that aims to influence judges’ views on climate issues) is now trying to defend her work to dress up climate propaganda as official guidance after being called out. Wentz writes, "The chapter underwent an extensive and rigorous peer review process." Really? That's the best she's got? Just a couple of months ago, a "peer reviewed" study that was published by Nature had to be retracted because it was BS. And in 2023 alone, more than 10,000 research papers were retracted. Wentz also has a vested interest in how judges rule on cases. She was a witness in Juliana v. United States.