the whole foundation discussion, at least from my side, was simply about trying to understand * in public * what the strategy is going forward. somehow that got reframed into me wanting preference, being worried about competition, thinking existing releases are competitive with jupiter, etc, etc, etc. as for the foundation, i walk away with a bit of a bad taste. there was a lot of attitude from one side, while others (like jacob) approached it much more constructively. hopefully the direction ends up closer to what jacob explained. otherwise, i think it could be negative for the ecosystem over time. at this point, if i were leading the foundation, i’d probably run a simple survey across the major solana teams to understand how they actually feel about the organization. purely for signal. my guess is that the feedback will be surprising. ultimatelly today is one of those days where i’m reminded not to try to have real conversations on twitter. it’s just not the place for it. people don’t really try to understand what you’re saying, they pick one piece of context, fill in the rest, and run with it.