Stablecoins don't spread the same way across regions. In some places, people choose them. In others, they're simply the better option available. Both are driving real onchain adoption. But it all comes down to the setting. Imagine the same person in two different environments: • On the left – banks are hard to reach, fees eat into every transfer, and settlements take days. A stablecoin on his phone works better than anything else available. • On the right – banking apps handle everything, tap-to-pay is everywhere, and instant transfers are standard. Stablecoins here have to integrate with systems that have been there for decades. Same person. Same technology. Different starting point. Which side will ultimately drive the biggest wave of onchain volume? Drop 1 or 2 and share your take in the comments ↓