I am very late to the party but @RefineInk is very good. When you prompt ChatGPT/Gemini/etc to proofread a paper, even on highest settings, they miss a lot of stuff even through repeated passes. For some reason Refine is very good at catching inconsistencies/errors/etc

@RefineInk You're doing yourself a huge disservice if you don't do a pass through Refine before paper submission/posting/etc. Well worth the $50/paper (cheaper if you subscribe) IMO even if you're paying out of pocket.

@RefineInk As far as I can tell, the tool isn't so good for ideating/figuring out macro directions for your paper; that doesn't seem to be the goal. I have a nice system with ChatGPT/Gemini/etc for this. But I'm going to be using Refine for pre-submission checks aggressively from now on

@prof_narayanan @RefineInk just kidding. idk it's pretty random honestly. Stuff I've worked on before, stuff I randomly hear about, stuff I see at conferences... idk