The sooner you realize that you are not very smart and your luck is quite average, the easier it is to profit. Left-side trading relies on your intelligence, while right-side trading relies on your luck (I'm just saying), and ultimately, it is driven by human nature. Dollar-cost averaging follows the market and the asset itself, unaffected by your human will, using potentially higher costs to eliminate timing risks. Since many people say that investing is about fighting against human nature, why not completely abandon the human aspect? On the path of dollar-cost averaging into $hype, I often get asked whether to sell after such a big increase (last round) or whether to continue dollar-cost averaging now that it's about to unlock (this round), and so on. In reality, if you have dollar-cost averaged into BTC or other assets that have performed well, you will understand that frequently exhibiting significant trends is a characteristic of quality assets, indicating strong market consensus and often showing one-directional price movements. At this point, selling might be right or wrong; regardless of whether it's good or bad in the short term, your trading will increasingly be influenced by human nature. A slight change will become a reason for you to modify your dollar-cost averaging parameters, ultimately evolving into completely human-driven high selling and low buying or chasing highs and cutting losses. Both of these "human trading mindsets" are contrary to the significant trendiness of quality assets, and in the end, both profits and losses are limited. Being anti-human nature does not mean lacking in gambling instinct; on the contrary, dollar-cost averaging is a relentless bullish gamble. The significant trend could be upward, but it could also be downward. The final outcome brings the joy of victory, but also the bitterness of failure. Therefore, I only dollar-cost average into hype, and I can also understand everyone who chooses to take profits or cut losses, as choosing mediocrity in human nature at least allows one to hold the freedom of how much to lose in their own hands.