The success of Brevis lies in its first large-scale real demand for the crypto space, closely tied to money, by "issuing airdrops" rather than empty technical discussions and emotional appeals. Prior to this, project airdrops and protocol incentives relied heavily on snapshots, but the timing and rules of these snapshots were unclear, leading users to blindly rush in, wasting a lot of gas and time. After the snapshot, there was a collective retreat, making it impossible for projects to sustain long-term. The most reasonable approach is definitely to link user behavior and incentives over the long term, continuously distributing based on on-chain contributions. However, the technology for on-chain calculations is too difficult and costly. Project teams need to constantly monitor the actions of tens or hundreds of thousands of addresses and adjust balances based on the consumption of the funding pool, which is why the seemingly crude snapshot has become a necessary choice. Brevis, on the other hand, utilizes the characteristics of ZK to obtain data on-chain, compute processes off-chain, and verify results on-chain, helping numerous Uniswap and Aster projects complete long-term incentive processes. Currently, the rewards distributed through Brevis have reached as high as $233 million, so for projects like Brevis, the business can be sustainable, providing an opportunity to navigate through bull and bear markets 🫡 All those who complain that the crypto space is a casino and that their projects are not understood by users, the so-called Builders, should learn from Brevis. It's not that your technology is lacking; it's just that you haven't applied it in the right place.