I don't quite agree with Mr. Ma's view that "BTC is a solidified product of energy..." In fact, energy storage can be efficiently transferred in many ways; the significance of energy lies in its consumption, not in being dissipated as 100% heat radiation. If BTC's value is defined solely in terms of energy, then it would actually depreciate, as you can convert energy into BTC, but you cannot convert BTC back into energy... BTC can add the attribute of being a financial medium for energy among its various asset properties, but it should never be reduced to the status of a solidified energy product... BTC has a grander positioning and goal.