The reason why people aren't talking about @wardenprotocol these days (feat. If it’s boring, throw away the rankings) - Season 3 has suddenly been extended indefinitely, leaving only the whiners sealing their fate - Pushing forced volume while only creating anticipation - Sluggish trading - They released some gambling-like game with ups and downs, which also seems to be a forced volume tactic (super boring) - The onboarded AI agents often seem to have something missing I dreamed of an AI agent HUB similar to Sentient, but they are doing overly blatant marketing to cover operational costs or exit expenses. The previous promises have long been broken, and instead of seeing improvements in the product, it’s just fees, fees, fees. It’s not a pub deck, and I don’t understand why a project pursuing AI agent Hub services is acting like this. —— So I gave up. I was relatively high in the rankings, but everyone should remember that rankings are not important. What matters is finding a good project and collaborating. Of course, the launch of $WARD could be successful. However, from what the team is showing now, I only feel "exit" and nothing else. Most of the projects I filtered out have given me this feeling. Warden was decent until Season 2, but from Season 3 onwards, it felt like they crossed a line, so I boldly gave up. Please don’t fall into the trap of rankings. Let’s think carefully about whether the project is genuinely trying to solve existing problems, whether there’s passion, and whether there’s capability....