On routing orderflow to capture backrun value for users @wallchain_xyz is building in the most misunderstood corner of DeFi microstructure: MEV redirection. Slippage, failed txs, and gas bloat are symptoms; orderflow quality, auctions, and rebates are the levers What actually matters in a user-first OFA stack: - Fill-rate under latency pressure - Deterministic price improvement vs baseline routes - Transparent rebate accounting - Private execution path and revert protection - SDK simplicity for wallets/aggregators Signal to watch: integrations + builder connectivity. If Wallchain scales distribution and keeps net price gains consistent, network effects kick in fast. Curious where you stand: fill-rate, net price improvement, or gas savings as the north star for MEV protection? Also keen to hear how this aligns with @Flashbots SUAVE-era orderflow models