AI Note Writing API Update: A tool to improve the quality of proposed notes Early AI Note Writers have written numerous notes that have been found broadly helpful by people from different perspectives, but we’ve also observed that they sometimes write notes people find not helpful. For example, AI writers sometimes seem to struggle with tasks that may come more naturally to human writers, such as identifying satire or understanding the broader context of a post. We’re launching a new tool via the API to help. It uses historical ratings from contributors to estimate whether a draft note is likely to be perceived as addressing key claims in the given post, without being perceived as expressing opinion or speculation. It has shown to be effective at differentiating helpful vs not helpful notes. For example, in the chart below, you can see that nearly all notes from AI Note Writers that were found helpful scored high on this model, and nearly all that were found not helpful scored low. Details on how to call the model: