Yesterday, President Donald J. Trump formed the National Committee for the Administration of Gaza (NCAG) that will install a "technocratic" government in Gaza. A few of the names that you may or may not know that have been chosen to serve on the President's technocratic governance Committee: 1. Ajay Banga is a member of the Trilateral Commission. Banga was elected President of the World Bank on May 3, 2023, having been nominated to the position in February 2023 by the Biden administration. Banga has been member of the Advisory Board of BeyondNetZero since 2021. -BNZ Invested in companies like GRESB (ESG benchmark provider) and EcoVadis (sustainability assessment). -Acquired a stake in fund manager Sustainable Development Capital LLP. -Publishes an annual Climate & Sustainability Report detailing portfolio progress on climate goals In February 2015, President Barack Obama appointed Banga as a member of the President's Advisory Committee for Trade Policy and Negotiations. Following the 2020 elections, Banga was an outside adviser to then Vice President Kamala Harris as chairman of the Partnership for Central America, where he led a group of business leaders who advised her on the administration's work in El Salvador, Guatemala and Honduras. 2. Sir Tony Blair served as the Prime Minister of the UK from 1997 to 2007. He has been the executive chairman of the Tony Blair Institute for Global Change since 2016. Blair introduced the Gender Recognition Act in 2004 which allows those with "gender dysphoria" to legally change their gender. Blair is a member of the Fabian Society which is inherently technocratic, promoting socialism through gradual, expert-led, and bureaucratic means rather than revolution, relying on "competent experts" to manage society for efficiency, which is a core tenet of technocracy. Blair led the UK government's abolition of the primary purpose rule in June ,1997. This deliberate policy change of Blair from late 2000 until early 2007 was to open up the UK to mass migration. Tony Blair has a long-standing relationship with the World Economic Forum (WEF), joining their board of trustees in 2007 and remaining an active contributor, speaker, and participant in their events and initiatives.

While in New York City in 2019 to record our first conversations about the Woke Revolution, I shared with @ConceptualJames a remark made by a Singaporean member of the WEF nine years earlier about what the future held for us all. I had asked if it was communism and he said "well yes and no." He then replied, "more of a national socialism."

Candace Owens, together with her colleagues from the Woke Right, has been involved in attempts purposed to move the United States closer to the third phase of ideological subversion. Ideological subversion (also referred to as active measures, psychological warfare or cognitive warfare) is a strategic process used by one power to covertly or overtly influence and ultimately undermine the core beliefs, values, and social order of a target society or nation. The primary objective of ideological subversion is to distort the target population's perception of reality to an extent where they can no longer make rational decisions in their own interest, leading to societal fracture and susceptibility to external influence or control. Candace Owens, her reflexive influencer colleagues, and a multitude of "Woke Right" Christian Nationalist Pastors are using their past positive reputations as a form of operational protection as they introduce radical propaganda that is intended to sow doubt, destabilize cognitive foundations, and incite conflict among the population of the United States during this season of dialectical political warfare. Once a new piece of propaganda is introduced, other "influencers" propagate and talk about the new and radical concepts from Candace Owens, Nick Fuentes, Jeffrey Sachs or any number of other revolution-minded agitating propagandists active in the Woke Right. This is reflexivity, a constant social media feedback loop of fertile fallacies intended on creating a "less than equilibrium" state of affairs that is ripe for revolution. In this confused state, the target population no longer recognizes what interests it should defend, nor how to defend them. Individuals become unable to distinguish truth from propaganda, and even when confronted with factual evidence, their reactions are shaped by pre-programmed ideological responses. Ideological subversion harnesses and redirects a nation's own internal dynamics, such as class, ethnic, or ideological divisions, and turns them into weapons against itself, much like in the martial art of jiu-jitsu. This entire process has been happening openly in social media, using our nation's free speech and democratic systems, which makes it seem like a legitimate internal process and difficult to identify as an external threat. Let there be no doubt, this ideological subversion represents open warfare - as authentic as the battles taking place in Venezuela or Iran - but it is unfolding on our own territory. The aim is to ignite an actual kinetic civil war between the Woke Left faction of the population, which is prepared to set the United States ablaze, and the newly formed Woke Right faction that is eager to tear down the United States.