Trendaavat aiheet
#
Bonk Eco continues to show strength amid $USELESS rally
#
Pump.fun to raise $1B token sale, traders speculating on airdrop
#
Boop.Fun leading the way with a new launchpad on Solana.

Moneystack 🟧 .ip | DeSpread
Personal Reflections on the Sonic Meetup
I don't usually voice about controversial things, but I've put together some personal thoughts regarding the recent Sonic meetup incident.
1. Like it or not, the practice of providing numerous rewards and giveaways to the Korean community has become recognized as an effective marketing strategy.
While I also don't believe this meetup style is sustainable in the long term, but at this moment investing significant costs in meetups for the Korean community paradoxically yields the highest efficiency in the Korean market. When there's a proven playbook that works well in Korea, is there really a reason to avoid it? If the most effective marketing method is available, should we really shun it just to appear 'legit'?
if so, every project would have to develop its product for 10 years before even thinking about token issuance.
2. I think Listing on Korean Exchanges is a Natural Project Goal and Validation. Is it truly wrong for projects to seek listings on Korean exchanges?
Being listed on a Korean exchange is not only crucial for securing liquidity but also serves as an indicator of a project's credibility and scale.
While there's sometimes a narrative that projects attempt listings merely to 'dump' their tokens on Korea, I believe this is a natural business decision from a project's perspective. (I'm not thrilled about those situations either, but I don't think it's right to say "don't even try to get listed just because I don't like it.")
Of course, there are instances where projects' actions might be disappointing, but we cannot fault every project for pursuing such listings.
3. I disagree with the perspective that some are trying to 'enlighten' Koreans. Some people just think korean is just 'exit liquidity'. Why do we always label them solely as exit liquidity? I think each korean has their own strong point.
i think both those giving out merchandise and those receiving it seemed genuinely happy in that video. Why do we always conclude that 'projects view Korea as exit liquidity' just by looking at that video? From my perspective, it simply looks like they're distributing T-shirts to participants in the back who can't reach, and everyone seems to be having a good time.
This isn't akin to carelessly throwing money in a club, nor do I believe there's an intention to belittle Koreans.
And we can see lots of positive tweet reactions from meetup attendees, with verifying receipt of items, actively participating in yaping and expressing enjoyment.
I'm also three years into this industry myself, I have plenty of shirts and am not as desperate for raffles anymore. However, criticizing others from and saying 'those people don't realize they're being used as exit liquidity,' can come across as a sense of superiority. It's worth reflecting on whether one has forgotten their own grind when they were just starting out.
4. A Rational Understanding of Accident Response is Needed. While it would have been best for no accident to occur, is it wrong to call firefighters and police to handle a situation once an accident happens?
Entrance was being controlled, and a person who had already entered within the capacity limit suddenly fell due to back pain, knocking over a pillar which then fell on someone else. I understand the police then arrived to manage the situation. It's unhelpful for a reasonable response to an unforeseen accident, like calling the police, to be distorted or exaggerated. (Separately, I wish both individuals a swift recovery 🙏)
5. Categorizing Korean Market Efforts as 'Disregard' is Inappropriate.
I don't understand why marketing activities specifically for Korea are so easily labeled as 'disregarding' the Korean market.
Similarly, I question whether a project that has already completed its listing in Korea is obligated to continue spending like they spent on peak beyond that point. While it's true that many projects cut off support abruptly after listing, (I sincerely hope Sonic, and indeed many other projects, do not follow this path.)
A listing on a Korean exchange, which can drive up prices, also benefits existing global holders. I hope that the Korean market is not always confined to a 'victim' narrative.
Conclusion
Personally, I hope this meetup controversy serves as a catalyst for these excessive 'chicken game' style meetups to wind down. However, given how much attention this marketing approach generates, I anticipate it will likely continue at least until KBW. I plan to publish a more detailed article summarizing my thoughts on this matter soon.

Steve18.7. klo 23.20
seriously?
At some point, it has become painfully clear that many projects have begun to blatantly disregard the Korean market. In a market where product quality should be the top priority, the focus has instead shifted to what kind of food was served and how much money was handed out — as if that’s what defines success.
At @FourPillarsFP, we do not view this trend positively. Moving forward, we will not support any projects that treat Korea as a joke — organizing meaningless meetups and offering no real value.
Spending money on a meetup? That’s perfectly fine. Many great projects in the past have invested in meaningful gatherings. That’s not the issue here.
The problem is that now, it has become so blatant. Projects are merely thinking about how to boost headcount at events, boast about the turnout, amplify the optics, and then eventually list their tokens on Korean exchanges — only to dump them on retail investors.
Koreans also need to wake up. The airdrops you receive might seem significant in the short term, but in the end, those projects will dump even larger amounts of their tokens on Korean exchanges.
If Korean exchanges are acting responsibly, they should permanently refuse to list projects like these.
They say, ‘We’re doing this because we truly care about Korea’? Please. The moment Korean exchanges stop listing their tokens, these projects will stop spending money here altogether.
All they want is Korean liquidity — that’s it. You could honestly call them grifters.
7K
이 정도 비용이라면 충분히 상용화 가능한 라인이라고 본다..

яobin linus16.7. klo 20.59
BitVM 3s: Simple, Secure, Succinct
💰 $100,000 → $100 collateral
🐜 4 MB → 66 kB transactions
⚡ 1,000x efficiency improvement
New paper:

832
💰 2030년 AI 시장: $1.8T
(= 헬스케어 시장 = 크립토 시총 = 글로벌 광고 시장 규모)
그랜드 뷰 리서치에 따르면, AI 시장은 2030년 경 $1.8T 에 도달할 예정이라고 합니다.
이렇게 커가는 시장에서는, 금을 캐러 가는 게 아니라 청바지와 곡괭이를 팔아야 진짜 돈을 번다는 말이 있습니다.
그런 관점에서 우리는 AI 시장이 커갈 때, 유행하는 AI 에이전트 및 제품에 대한 투자를 진행할 수도 있겠지만 더 큰 관점에서는 AI들의 인프라가 될 수 있는 잠재력을 가진 쪽에 보다 더 집중해보아야 합니다. 그런 관점에서 보면,
- 서브넷들이 상호작용할 수 있는 구심점이 되는 비트텐서 $TAO
- 결국 다양한 AI들이 수행한 복잡한 작업을 한대 모아 그 결과를 조정 및 추론 해주는 구심점 성격을 띈 알로라 (@AlloraNetwork )
- AI 할루시네이션을 잡아네기 위한 베이스 레이어가 되려는 @Mira_Network 정도가 생각납니다.
어제 미라 네트워크의 Head of Growth 스톤과 만나 다양한 얘기를 나눴는데, 이 내용은 또 추후 서술해보도록 하겠습니다

921
Moneyel Hennie - Sidekick x Bithumb Poker Scramble! ♠️
Today at 10 p.m., @Sidekick_Labs will be broadcast on! (link comment)
Last year, Bithumb held a tournament with Double A Poker, which is serviced by Hangame, with a total prize of 100 million BTC. It seems that the tournament was quite popular.
So this year, 8/8 ~8/10! The tournament will be held for three days with a total prize fund of 400 million won. How can you participate in the conference?
After purchasing 30,000 won worth of game money, you can participate in the Double-A Poker online qualifier with about 200 people and get a ticket to participate in the offline tournament if you are in the top 20!
I've really studied poker a lot these days. I hope you don't fall too far in love with my smart look. I will show you how I passed the preliminary round through the fierce competition of 200 people. @BithumbOfficial will take the prize money from you. Mr. Yusoon!

1,03K
Wormhole, Stacks Integration!
STX and sBTC are finally going to take a picture of the hen that came out of the yard. Through Wormhole NTT, Stacks tokens will go outside of the Stacks network, such as Solana and Sui.
Past sBTC is expanding into Solana / Sui / Aptos! There was a PR, but there was a question, 'So how did you get there?', but it seems that the outline is being established to some extent through the announcement of this wormhole.
Wormhole NTT is an abbreviation for 'N-it-T Big T Lansper', and in the existing general cross-chain, there must be some liquidity for the token on both sides of the chain that sends and receives the transfer, but Wormhole NTT proceeds with the token transfer neatly without such a thing. Not only that, but even if you have STX on another chain, you have the liquidity to make these tokens fully compatible with your existing governance system!
In the meantime, no matter how much Stacks is called Bitcoin L2, it definitely feels like a remote island, so I hope that liquidity will flow much more freely through this wormhole integration!

8,98K
31 Shades of Alola, What Is Alola Good About?
1. Predictive pricing for DeFi assets
2. Assess Loan Protocol Risk
3. Fraud detection in financial transactions
4. Optimize your crypto investment portfolio
5. Market sentiment analysis for trading strategies
6. Yield Farming Strategy Optimization
7. Decentralized Insurance Risk Modeling
8. Evaluate your credit score for DeFi loans
9. NFT Price Prediction
10. Liquidity Pool Optimization
11. Stablecoin Peg Stability Prediction Analysis
12. Smart Contract Vulnerability Detection
13. Decentralized Identity Verification
14. On-chain reputation scoring
15. Predictive maintenance of blockchain infrastructure
16. Optimize trading fees
17. Decentralized ad targeting
18. Web3 Platform Content Recommendation
19. DAO Predictive Governance
20. New Protocol Tokenomics Modeling
21. Decentralized Supply Chain Forecasting
22. AI-powered arbitrage opportunity detection
23. Predict Staking Rewards
24. Cross-chain bridge security analysis
25. Decentralized healthcare data analytics
26. Predictive analysis of game NFTs
27. AI-powered community management
28. Decentralized Energy Grid Optimization
29. Synthetic Data Generation for Privacy Analysis
30. AI-Powered Legal Contract Analysis
31. Decentralized Social Network Predictive Analytics
How many times do you crave it..? I wonder if it was because of a recent incident. I want you to solve it by @AlloraNetwork 12 times

782
Alola is not an In-N-Out burger.
To be precise, it tastes worse than Alola. Even the In-N-Out Burger is just one ingredient for Alola.
Alola is an abstraction layer for collaborative AI, a project in which many AI models come together to produce a more powerful and comprehensive output to solve a single problem.
For example, Perflexity is strong in real-time web search, Chatgpity is good at writing, Gemini is good at coding, and so on, but it is difficult for us to find and work on 'which AI is optimized for my work...?'
But we told Alola
If you say, "Hey, I'm going to code, the AI who is the best at coding will come and colonel."
Alola is simply brought in through collective reasoning. It would be easy to understand that it is similar to Hotel Trivago AI Trivago!
So if we say to a chef who knows how to use Alola, "Hey, bring me the best burger,"
Alola will be making the most appropriate burger in the world, somewhere between McDonald's, Lotteria, In-N-Out, Five Guys, Popeyes, Mom's Touch, and Shack Shack Burger.
Do you know.. I don't think there's anything in between. It will be a higher concept of hamburger than in between.
So if we get to eat the most delicious burger someday.. You'll be exclaiming, 'This is so alor.' Is this article a little aloe?

1,69K
Johtavat
Rankkaus
Suosikit
Ketjussa trendaava
Trendaa X:ssä
Viimeisimmät suosituimmat rahoitukset
Merkittävin