Top
Ranking
Favorites
Trending tokens
Latest news
Trending topics
Latest feed
Disclaimer: The content on this page is provided by third parties. See T&Cs.
Biteye Secondary Market Daily Report 20250321
Hot Tokens: $XRP, $TUT, $BANANA, $MUBARAK, $SIREN, $KOMA

The founder of $ADA just posted this photo on his private jet taking some cats he found in Hawaii back home to America 🇺🇸
And you wonder why i’m bearish…

Top Ai coins analysis past 24 hours
Strongest Ai coin today: $BID
Other AI coins in green: $ARC, @aixbt_agent , Griffain, Virtuals and Ai16Z.
All other Ai coins are down on the 24h TF.
Weakest coin: Fartcoin
$AVA

pixels bench live on .
ip violation. cannot trade.
70,000,000 $bench sent to rlp.ron. $rlp

My guiding principle for @solana transaction (TX) delivery is that the sender pays a fee and is fully entitled to indicate how the TX should be delivered. The sender should be able to skip over untrusted validators or opt out of bundles to avoid sandwiches.
Here are a couple of solution ideas:
1) After incorporating user feedback, we will upload our Yellowstone Block List program to mainnet next week. This permissionless program will allow community members to maintain lists of sandwiching validators, AKA a "naughty list." A sender will optionally indicate if they want to use a naughty list to skip over untrusted leaders when delivering their TX. At launch, @triton_one will support this program, and we'll encourage other RPC providers to join us in protecting users. (The program is open source and permissionless -- we want this to be a standard implementation across all RPCs. Look for a link to Github in a post below this one.)
2) I'd like to see MEV/TX delivery platforms (Jito, Paladin, & others) offer opt-out mechanisms for users to indicate when they do not want a given TX included in a bundle. The solution can be as simple as including an advertised sentinel account for write-locking inside the TX. If the block engine sees one of the sentinel accounts, it will refuse to accept the bundle. Write locking specific accounts is similar to the vote account hack currently in use but doesn't present a threat to consensus.
Most validators will choose the happy path and work with MEV platforms that honor opt-out requests described in solution #2. For any remaining validators who support sandwiching, users can refuse to send them transactions with solution #1. Those solutions align with the fee payer's interests. Of course, I'm open to all other ideas that respect fee-payers.
#LFG

people who say they 'don't do tourist traps' are just mad they can't enjoy the world's largest ball of twine without feeling like a sheep, but hey, at least they can judge from afar while secretly wishing for a kitschy photo op and a souvenir shot glass
The art meme section $bubb didn't catch up, what else can follow? 👀
I didn't know much about $AVAX before I got onboarded into @TheArenaApp w/ @jasonmdesimone
Then, @sunnymaanz, @NFTsAreNice, @0xThaDream and @bubits_ onboarded me into AVAX gaming & memecoins w/ @playoffthegrid & @ketfromwyoming earlier this year
Next, I went to ETH Denver, met a ton of people from the @avax team, was lucky to get $BLUB presale, and got hooked up with a ton of AVAX merch
My crypto journey with $BTC goes back 8 years, and 4 years for $SOL but AVAX, this is just the beginning and I couldn't be more pumped to see where it goes next
🔺doption
XRP market cap now more than 2x SOL market cap
RT @superwoj: new on warpcast: farcaster earnings page :)
see your degen, moxie or warpcast rewards in one place
optionally flex it by ma…
Trending investments
You may also like