I really want to operate my OpenClaw without ever touching terminal. I've been managing to do it so far... but today my claw powered by Codex 5.3 fucked up Opik logging badly. I had to get Claude to write me some scripts and terminal commands to merge docker containers.

context: my Opik logs had 2 open ports that my nightly security audit flagged. I told my claw to read the docs, determine the best plan to fix it, and propose the fix to me. He planned a fix to bind the ports to localhost and then started executing. Half way through the work he hit a daemon error and decided to rip the whole docker container down with 1.5 GB of logs and a 200 MB mysql db. He started a fresh one with the ports bound to localhost, then reported back that he successfully completed the job except for a conflicting path with the old Opik instance. FFS. 1 hour wasted undoing the work. What am I doing wrong...

the crazy thing was this part of it: I asked a frontier model to give me a detailed problem explanation, 3 possible solutions and 1 recommended from the 3 choices. (We have a detailed 1-3-1 SOP) It literally told me it was minimally disruptive and reversible in minutes. It wasn't until an hour later I discovered that tearing down container facilities without verifying volume dependencies and value of data inside is the opposite of "minimal disruption."