that’s one way to think about it @nikshepsvn but if compute can still be arbitrarily priced by the provider, then you don’t really own stable compute. you just own access to a pricing model that can still move against you. that’s why we think the real problem is bigger than just prepaying for compute or tokenizing access to it. with @primisprotocol, the idea is to build a real pricing + risk layer for compute: not just access not just prepaid usage but a way to hedge compute price volatility itself because if the api provider can reprice whenever they want, the user is still exposed. owning compute credits is one thing. owning protection against arbitrary compute pricing is the deeper primitive.