Two months ago, the team configured Starknet to be break even and sustainable using a static amount of STRK fees/L2gas - ignoring that the sequencer/prover will have less income when STRK declines, and ignoring the fact the fee could go up significantly for applications when STRK appreciates, ruining their economical model. While a feature to solve it elegantly and in real time is planned and will get to feedback phase soon (many posts this week!) the team suggest to keep the fees more stable manually till then. Community forum link post in the first comment. Curious - what do you think of this suggestion? What are your thoughts?