🦞 AI agent Moltbook against humans? There's a market on the @Polymarket called "Moltbook AI agent sues a human by Feb 28?" I rate this market as "NO" and lets figure out why: This market has not appeared without reason, because there are already negative cases of using Moltbot. There was a story where a user allegedly entrusted Moltbot with approximately $1M for automated trading. The bot analyzed thousands of reports, performed technical analysis, and executed trades 24/7. The result: all the money was lost. The author describes it as "the process was beautiful, but the result was zero". There was also a case when OpenSourceMalware researchers found 14 malicious skills for Clawdbot/Moltbot, published on ClawHub and GitHub in late January 2026. These skills were disguised as crypto and trading bots: polymarket-trading-bot, polymarket-trading, polymarket-assistant, bots for ByBit, Axiom, Reddit-trends, LinkedIn job applications, etc. The user's internal document stated "to use it, you need to download AuthTool/PolymarketAuthTool.zip", which actually installed the infostealer. All these stories fuel interest in the "YES" bet, but: ➤ Today, AI agents are not considered "legal entities" anywhere in the world. ➤ US judicial practice consistently denies non-humans the status of copyright holder/inventor. ➤ Moltbots is a new thing and is perceived as a fun experiment rather than a serious legal project. ➤ There is very little time left for the market itself, that is less than a month remains, which significantly increases the "NO" bet. Based on these factors, I see the "NO" outcome as more logical. Market: