Personally, I think that trying to create tech/AI projects by forcing random devs to make a crypto project out of it within a day is pretty absurd. I enjoy gambling on these things because there is always money to be made, but for @BagsApp, it makes more sense to focus on artists. Artists are generally underpaid and underappreciated. They are more likely to want to build a community around a coin than random devs on github coding something for the lulz. @PsyopAnime was the perfect example, @skscartoon is also doing it well (for now), and generally, it feels more wholesome to support the art (at least to me, but I love art more than anything). There is one more project on pump doing it really well, but the artists are crypto-native so they weren't suddenly and forcefully onboarded. For tech projects, after the initial rush/pump comes the question - what is the utility here? And answer is always - there isn't one. Generally, in crypto, 99.99% projects don't need a token, and random hobby projects most definitely don't need it. Can't complain because at least there is something to trade in crypto besides the majors right now so I am going to keep gambling on whatever pops up. But if the main driving vehicle of this are fees for creators then artists adopting and becoming part of community naturally makes way more sense. Pretty much what @beeple did years ago, except that we are now in an extremely predatory environment with hundreds of "devs" shoving coins and insane demands down the people's throats. Whole memecoin system is generally broken and needs to be fixed because there is zero incentive to buy and hold anything for more than a few minutes, and traders are at a huge disadvantage. Glad to see the volume is coming back though, risk on mode means that market is healing finally after 10/10. Hoping that 2026 brings us another mania so we can make some life changing money again. Retardio.