" It feels like the Kaito series is all made by people from Shandong. No matter what they do, they always put the boss at the top of the list. yarm is the same. "

The old public chains that refuse to lie flat rely on three strategies for revival. I like using Kaito to observe social sentiment, Defillama to track capital flows, and DappRadar to monitor user activity. From my observations, @SonicLabs, @Aptos, and @NEARProtocol, these established public chains are all working hard, but many people are still unaware. Let’s dive in! ⬇️ Blood transfusion, repositioning, and reducing inflation—these are the three strategies I’ve summarized for the revival of old public chains. I’ve already introduced Sonic and Aptos, and now Near is also starting. As a first-generation high-performance public chain, sharding technology has always been Near's pride. Fast speed and low costs are great, but they also bury a hidden danger: high inflation. In simple terms, because the gas fees are low, the actual tokens destroyed are much smaller than those issued, leading to an oversupply, inflation occurs, and large holders lie flat to earn interest while the ecosystem collectively retires and does nothing. Data shows that Near has a fixed inflation rate of 5% per year, far exceeding the expected 2-3%. Due to the extremely low transaction fee burn rate of only 0.1%, the actual net inflation rate reaches as high as 4.9%. Approximately 60 million $NEAR tokens are added each year, with staking yields as high as 9%. So, what’s the result? Prices keep falling, token value is diluted, holders prefer to stake rather than engage in DeFi, and ecosystem projects are abandoning ship, starting a vicious cycle. Fortunately, they haven’t given up and are still working hard. They’ve now proposed a voting proposal to reduce emissions, and I’ll summarize the key points: ▰ Maximum inflation rate reduced from 5% to 2.5% ▰ Combined with a 0.1% fee burn rate, the actual inflation rate will drop to about 2.4% ▰ Maintain a fixed maximum inflation rate for easier community understanding and regular adjustments through voting If the proposal passes, NEAR will achieve a lower inflation rate, reduce token dilution, enhance token value potential, incentivize DeFi participation, and align with the inflation models of leading blockchains, strengthening long-term competitiveness and community confidence. However, there’s also a huge challenge; it will disrupt the existing benefits. What to do? Reducing emissions will inevitably lead to lower staking interest. If large-scale unstaking and selling occur, price volatility will be severe, and security will also be affected. I saw in the discussions that they mentioned increasing time weight, controlling the yield between 4% - 11%, meaning the longer you stake, the higher the rewards. This should be a great idea, but we’ll have to see how it’s executed. If you hold $NEAR, you can vote and discuss here: Voting address: Voting ends in 7 days, and currently, 36.16% agree. To pass, it needs to reach 66.67%, so we can observe the results. / The Near Foundation is very determined and knows how to create buzz. I felt that shifting the chain's focus towards AI was quite reliable, but when discussing whether to invest in $NEAR with the experts, there were many concerns, mainly about the inflation we talked about today. I will keep an eye on it. If it passes, it should be a big deal, similar to the new protocol we discussed earlier, @rhea_finance, which is definitely worth watching as recent data is surging. This is a soft-core popular science article. Through this article, you can gain a basic understanding of the following knowledge: ▰ Three strategies for the revival of old public chains ▰ Near's strategy to solve high inflation ▰ Betting on the Near ecosystem (not Author: anymose | A soft-core popular science writer <End of full text> * This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute any investment advice. Always remember to DYOR!

"\n\nThe magical rules of the Binance Creator Square\n\nThe number of posts surprisingly has the same weight as interaction data\n\nThe top 30 people globally\n\nOnly post once, and the reward is 0.002 U\n\nGRASS\n\n"

"\n\nTo be honest\n\nMerlin's wife is not bad\n\nShe didn't run away, didn't abandon the project, didn't betray the community\n\nShe also created quite a few opportunities for wealth\n\nAs a retail investor, I was just greedy\n\n"

" Is playing @edgeX_exchange expensive? It depends on personal skill level. I scored 1 point at $4.6. Wang Xiaolou @wang_xiaolou scored 1 point at -$6.1. Damn. "

"\n\n3 days up 8 times\n\nThen 4 days down 75%\n\n10 days low then up again 85%\n\nWelcome to the world of Aptos @EchoProtocol_\n\n"

"\n\nIt's not just the retail investors who suffer in a bull market.\n\n▰ @TOKYOBEAST_EN went alpha, closed down.\n▰ @zeuzdottrade suffered a hack, closed down.\n▰ @ParaSpace_NFT has been stolen from multiple times, closed down.\n\nMore importantly, many have turned into zombies, ghost towns.\n\n"}]}

"\n\nKaito seems to have some misunderstanding about the launch pad.\n\nFirst project\n\nSelling 1% of the tokens at a valuation of 400 million, first allocated then grabbed.\n\n50% unlocked after 1 year of lock-up, then 50% linearly over the next year.\n\nThe above information can only be seen after KYC.\n\nIs it just to scam me out of a KYC fee?\n\n"

Kaito's first launchpad project Espresso summary: ▰ Opens on the 23rd at 20:00 [Beijing Time] ▰ Valuation of 400 million dollars, raising 4 million dollars ▰ Divided into priority round and first-come-first-served round ▰ Launchpad fee revenue distributed to new feature gKAITO ▰ Does not support mainland phone numbers and KYC Espresso will decide on the distribution based on conditions such as mindshare, and the mouthful has really turned into a quota.